The effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid 19 pneumonia among critically ill patients

 

Karthikkeyan Rajachandran*, Giphy Susan Varghese, J Vinoth Kumar

Medical Intensive Care Unit, PSG Hospitals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: kkpilldoc@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonist, is being evaluated for the management of covid-19 pneumonia. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid-19 pneumonia. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single centre study performed in 121 patients diagnosed with severe covid-19 pneumonia. 83 patients received standard of care treatment whereas 38 patients received tocilizumab along with standard of care. Tocilizumab was administered intravenously at 8mg/kg (upto a maximum of 800mg). The second dose of Tocilizumab was given 12 to 24 hours apart. The primary outcome measure was ICU related and hospital related mortality. The secondary outcome measures were change in clinical status of patients measured by WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale, changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, secondary infections and duration of ICU stay. Results: Tocilizumab was administered between 3-27 days after the patient reported symptoms ( a median of 10.9 days ) and between the 1st to 3rd day of ICU admission (median of 2.1 days) . In Tocilizumab group, 16(42.1%) of 38 patients died in ICU whereas in standard of care group, 27(32.53%) of 83 patients died. The difference in clinical status assessed using WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale at 28 days between Tocilizumab group and standard of care group was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 2.97, p = 0.44). Conclusion: Tocilizumab plus standard care was not superior to standard care alone in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes at day 28.

 

KEYWORDS: Tocilizumab, Covid-19, Cytokine storm, Secondary infections, Inflammatory markers.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus disease (covid-19), caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in China and has rapidly spread across continents1-8. On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a SARS-CoV-2 pandemic9-11. As of June 2021, more than 180 million people have diagnosed with covid-19 infection and more than 3 million deaths have occurred globally. The cytokine storm mediated by overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines have been observed in critically ill covid-19 patients12.

 

Cytokine storm may progress to cardiovascular collapse, multiple organ dysfunction and death rapidly. Therefore, early identification, treatment and prevention of cytokine storm are of crucial importance for recovery of patients13-19.

 

Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody of IgG1 class, which is directed against both soluble and membrane-bound forms of interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor. In case of severe rheumatoid arthritis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, castleman’s disease, neuromyelitis optica, giant cell arteritis and cytokine release syndrome tocilizumab is highly used. It has been used to mitigate the life threatening cytokine release syndrome associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy1,16,20,21. Tocilizumab has been proposed as a potential therapy for the cytokine storm syndrome associated with severe covid-19 pneumonia. Inhibition of IL-6 activity may ameliorate the inflammatory responses, reduce the detrimental effects of covid-19 and improve the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients2,22-24.

 

The results of various studies and clinical trials with Tocilizumab showed divergent results . The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid-19 pneumonia among critically ill patients.

 

METHODS:

Study design and participants:

This is a retrospective, observational, single centre study done in a tertiary care hospital in Tamil Nadu region, India on patients with severe covid-19 pneumonia. We derived data from electronic health records of patients who received intensive care unit (ICU) care.

 

The study population was adults aged 18 years or older with covid-19, confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction who were admitted to ICU between April and October 2020. Eligible patients had covid-19 associated pneumonia, defined as at least one of the following: presence of  30 or more than 30 breaths per minute respiratory rate, peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SaO2) of less than 93% in room air, PF ratio (a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2)) of less than or equal to 200mm Hg in room air and lung infiltrates of more than 50% [radiologically – High resolution computed tomography (HRCT)/Chest X-ray] within 24–48 hours of hospital admission.

 

Exclusion criteria for the use of Tocilizumab were coexistent infections other than covid-19, use of immunomodulatory drugs in last 3 months, raised aminotransferases levels greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal, neutrophils less than 1000/mm3, platelets less than 100000/mm3, bowel diverticulitis, gastrointestinal perforation, pregnant and lactating women.

 

The study was approved by the Institutional human ethical committee (PSG/IHEC/2020/Appr/EXP/227) with a waiver of informed consent.

 

Procedures:

Electronic medical records of the patients was used to obtain the data of demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, treatments, laboratory investigations, Subsequent Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and clinical outcome . All patients received standard of care treatment at the intensive care unit according to hospital policy. Standard of care treatment included Methylprednisolone (1mg/kg q24h for 7 days), Remdesivir (200mg on day 1 followed by 100mg q24h for 10 days in mechanically ventilated patients and 5 days in other patients) and Enoxaparin 1mg/kg q12h.

In addition to standard treatment care, a non randomly selected subset of patients also received Tocilizumab. Patients were administered with Tocilizumab when a cytokine storm is suspected. In patients with evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) within 72 hours of worsening of oxygenation the administration of tocilizumab is considered. However, the final decision to use Tocilizumab was at the discretion of the treating physician considering the affordability and willingness of patient attenders. Tocilizumab was administered intravenously at 8mg/kg (upto a maximum of 800mg). The second dose of Tocilizumab was given 12 to 24 hours apart.

 

Outcomes:

The primary outcome measure was ICU related and hospital related mortality. The secondary outcome measures were change in clinical status of patients measured by WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale, changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, secondary infections and duration of ICU stay.

 

Statistical analysis:

The baseline characteristics of patients treated with Tocilizumab was compared with those treated with standard of care alone. Demographics and clinical variables of both treatment groups were summarized using median (IQR) for continuous variables and by frequency (%) for categorical variables. Continuous variables and categorical variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test respectively. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS, version 26. Odd’s ratio was used to represent the effect on primary outcome and secondary outcomes such as mortality upto 28 days, clinical status at day 28 and incidence of secondary infections. Changes in IL-6 levels in the both treatment arms were compared by paired t test.

 

RESULTS:

The study was conducted with a sample size of 121. 83 patients received standard of care treatment whereas 38 received Tocilizumab along with standard of care. The baseline characteristics and investigations of the patients are summarized in Table 1. The median age of Tocilizumab and standard care group were 61.025 (40 – 84) and 60 (19 – 83) respectively (p = 0.66). 26 (68.4%) males and 12 females (31.5%) were included in Tocilizumab group whereas in standard of care, 61 (73.49%) were males and 22 (26.5%) were females. Diabetes, hypertension and obstructive airway disease were the most common comorbidities. Most of the patients were presented with complaints of fever, cough and breathlessness.

 

 

Median duration between onset of symptoms and hospitalization was 4.71(1 – 11) and 6.59 (1 – 21) days in Tocilizumab group and standard of care group respectively. Tocilizumab was administered a median of 10.9 days (3 – 27) from the onset of symptoms, 7.4 days (1 – 23) from the day of hospitalization and 2.1 days (1 – 3) from the day of ICU admission.


 

Table 1: Baseline characteristics and investigations of patients

 

  Tocilizumab group (n = 38)

 Standard of care group (n = 83)

P value

Age

Sex

  Male

  Female

BMI *

Comorbidities

  Yes

  No

Comorbidity count

  0

  1

  2

  > 3

Diabetes

Hypertension

Obstructive airway disease

Symptoms

  Fever

  Cough

  Breathlessness

Baseline WHO 7 category

ordinal scale $

4

5

6

 

Inflammatory markers

  Ferritin (ng/ml)

  Interleukin-6 (pg/ml)

  LDH (U/L)

WBC (mm3

Disease duration

  Days from symptom onset

  to hospitalization

  Days from symptom onset

  to ICU admission

SOFA score

Baseline PF ratio

(PaO2 : FiO2)

  < 100

  100 - 200

61.025 (40 – 84)

 

26 (68.4%)

12 (31.5%)

25.1 (16.1 – 34.6)

 

28 (73.6%)

10 (26.3%)

 

10 (26.3%)

12 (31.5%)

8 (21.05%)

8 (21.05%)

19 (50%)

14 (36.8%)

3 (7.8%)

 

28 (73.6%)

12 (31.5%)

26 (68.4%)

 

4.5 (4 – 6)

20 (52.6%)

15 (39.4%)

3 (7.8%)

 

 

1065.9 (142 – 2000)

618 (9.2 – 5000)

565.05 (338 – 1301)

12172 (4700 – 34000)

 

4.71 (1 – 11)

 

8.5 (2 – 27)

 

2.5 (1 - 12)

145.6 (89 - 198)

 

11 (28.9%)

27 (71.05%)

60 (19 -83)

 

61 (73.4%)

22 (26.5%)

25.81 (16.5 – 35.2)

 

72 (86.7%)

11 (13.3%)

 

11 (13.2%)

26 (31.3%)

27 (32.5%)

19 (22.8%)

41 (49.4%)

37 (44.6%)

8 (9.6%)

 

42 (50.6%)

32 (38.6%)

57 (68.7%)

 

4.5 (4 – 6)

46 (55.4%)

30 (36.1%)

7 (8.4%)

 

 

781.6 (49.5 – 2000)

 414 (1.9 – 5000)

566.1 (150.5 – 1704)

11643 (1100 – 31200)

 

6.59 (1 – 21)

 

7.8 (1 – 21)

 

3 (1 – 12)

143.9 (44.3 – 200)

 

27 (32.53%)

56 (67.46%)

0.66

0.6

 

 

0.44

0.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.00

0.552

1.0

 

0.01

0.54

1.0

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

0.08

0.205

0.801

0.9

 

0.734

 

0.082

 

0.57

0.523

 

 

BMI: Body mass index, SOFA: Sequentional Organ Failure Assessment, PaO2: Partial pressure of oxygen, FiO2: Fraction of inspired oxygen, LDH : Lactate dehydrogenase.

* BMI value is not available for 1 patient in Tocilizumab group and 19 patients in standard of care group.

$ 4: Hospitalised, no oxygen therapy, but requiring medical care, 5: Hospitalised, any supplemental oxygen 6: Hospitalised, requiring NIV (Non Invasive ventilation) or HFNC (High flow nasal cannula)

 


In Tocilizumab group, 16(42.1%) of 38 patients died in ICU whereas in standard of care group, 27(32.53%) of 83 patients died (26 in ICU and 1in ward). However, Tocilizumab was not associated with significant differences in mortality upto 28 days (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 3.32, p=0.308). Primary and secondary outcomes were summarized in Table 2.

 

The difference in clinical status assessed using WHO 7 category ordinary scale at 28 days between Tocilizumab group and standard of care group was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 2.97, p=0.44). At day 28, 3 patients in Tocilizumab group and 8 patients in standard of care group had supplemental oxygen requirements. No significant difference was found in duration of ICU stay between two groups. Secondary infections occurred in 11(28.9%) patients in Tocilizumab group and 23 (27.7%) patients in standard of care group. At week four, there was no statistical difference in rate of infections between two groups (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 2.48, p=0.88). Ventilatory support status of patients from first day of Tocilizumab therapy through 14 days follow up are illustrated in Figure 1.


Table 2 : Primary and secondary outcomes

Outcome

Tocilizumab

     (n=38)

Standard of

care (n=83)

Effect estimate

 

Effect size

(95% CI)

P value

Mortality upto 28 days

16 (42.1%)

27 (32.53%)

Odds ratio

1.5 (0.68 to 3.32)

0.308

Clinical status at day 28

 

 

Odds ratio

1-6 verus 7-8

1.35 (0.61 to 2.97)

0.44

1 : Not admitted to hospital,

     no limitation on activities

2 : Ambulatory,limitation of         activities, home oxygen

requirement

3 : Hospitalised, no oxygen therapy,

     not requiring medical care

4 : Hospitalised, no oxygen therapy,

     but requiring medical care

5 : Hospitalised, any supplemental

     oxygen

6 : Hospitalised, requiring NIV or

     HFNC

7 : Hospitalised, IMV or ECMO

8 : Death

15 (39.4%)

 

2 (5.2%)

 

 

0

 

2 (5.2%)

 

1 (2.6%)

 

2 (5.2%)

 

0

16 (42.1%)

45 (54.2%)

 

2 (2.4%)

 

 

0

 

1 (1.2%)

 

3 (3.6%)

 

3 (3.6%)

 

2 (2.4%)

27 (32.53%)

 

Duration of ICU stay

8.97

(1 – 20)

8.807

(1 – 18)

           -

           -

0.91

Secondary infections*

11 (28.9%)

23 (27.7%)

Odds ratio

1.06 (0.45 to 2.48)

0.88

NIV - Non invasive ventilation, HFNC - High flow nasal cannula, IMV - Invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO - Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

* Tocilizumab group : Bloodstream (n=9), Respiratory (n=4). 2 patients had bacteremia and respiratory infection. Standard of care group : Bloodstream (n=16), Respiratory (n=11). 4 patients had bacteremia and respiratory infection.

 

 

Figure 1 : Ventilatory support status of patients from first day of Tocilizumab therapy through 14 days follow up. HFNC - High flow nasal cannula, NRBM - Non rebreather mask, NIV - Non invasive ventilation, IMV - Invasive mechanical ventilation.

 


 

IL-6 levels were higher in patients who received tocilizumab when compared to standard of care group. A transient increase in IL-6 levels were noted in tocilizumab treated patients (see Table 3). In standard of care group, there is a decrease in IL-6 levels at day 14. No significant difference was found between two groups in the serum concentration of other inflammatory markers. One patient in Tocilizumab group had an injection site pain. There was no evidence of other adverse events in the Tocilizumab treated patients.

 

Table 3: Changes in interleukin-6 level

 

IL-6

P value

Baseline

At day 14

Tocilizumab group

618

861

0.47

Standard of care group

414

313.15

0.51

 

DISCUSSION:

This is a single centre, observational study performed with covid-19 pneumonia patients admitted to medical intensive care unit, we are reporting the clinical characteristics, investigations and outcomes in 121 patients, among which 38 were treated with tocilizumab along with standard treatment. The use of interleukin-6 inhibitor Tocilizumab was not associated with reduction in mortality. Tocilizumab was not associated with statistically significant improvement in clinical outcome assessed by WHO seven level ordinal scale at 28 days. Our results were in constrast to various observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) including TESTEO study1,25-29. A RCT conducted in Brazil showed results that are consistent to our study and that study concluded that the use of Tocilizumab was not superior to standard of care in improving clinical status at day 15 and it might increase mortality in severe or critical covid-19 patients21. The preliminary results of COVACTA, the Roche phase 3 RCT of Tocilizumab for severe covid-19 showed a failure to meet the endpoint of reduced mortality at week four. In this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tocilizumab in patients with severe covid-19 pneumonia, IL-6 inhibitor had no effect on clinical outcomes at week four, assessed with seven leven ordinal scale24. The CORIMUNO trial performed in covid-19 patients also failed to show the impact of Tocilizumab on clinical outcome at 28 days30.

 

Evidence suggests that covid-19 severity is associated with increased level of inflammatory mediators including cytokines and chemokines. As fatal covid-19 infection is characterized by cytokine storm syndrome, Tocilizumab has been approved in patient with covid-19 for its immunomodulatory effects. Interleukin receptor blockade have been reported to improve survival in covid-19 pneumonia31. In our study, a mild increase in IL-6 levels after tocilizumab administration was observed, whereas standard of care group showed a declining trend. Static or increased serum concentration of IL-6 after Tocilizumab administration were reported by  various studies including TESTEO study. Elimination of IL-6 occur via IL-6 receptor mediated clearance. Binding of Tocilizumab to IL-6 receptor results in inhibition of receptor mediated IL-6 clearance and thereby accumulation of IL-6 in serum1,32.

 

In our study, Tocilizumab treatment was not associated with statistically significant increase in secondary infections. It was not associated with major adverse events with exception of injection site pain in one patient. Few studies suggested that the use of Tocilizumab may be associated with higher risk of opportunistic infections, bacterial and fungal infections1,2. It was noted through other studies that the length of ICU and hospital stay were lower among Tocilizumab treated patients33. But in our study, there is no much difference in the length of ICU stay between both the groups.

 

As per studies, beneficial effects of Tocilizumab is related to early initiation of treatment in the course of illness. In STOP covid trial, decreased mortality was observed in tocilizumab treated patients who got admitted in ICU within 72 hours of onset of symptoms. An observational study in Spain concluded that Tocilizumab administration after 10 days of symptoms onset may decrease mortality in covid-19 pneumonia. In majority of Tocilizumab based randomized trials, 8 to 12 days is the average duration of symptoms at baseline. In our study, Tocilizumab was administered a median of 10.9 days after the onset of symptoms.

 

The limitations of our study is that it is an retrospective observational study and not a randomized comparison. This study was performed in a small sample size and only 38 patients received Tocilizumab. The decision on Tocilizumab initiation was taken by the treating physician based on clinical and laboratory parameters of patients, availability of the drug and affordability of patient attenders. Our study did not compare the radiological features of patients and the effect of Tocilizumab on it.

 

CONCLUSION:

Tocilizumab administration in severe covid-19 pneumonia patients requiring intensive care unit care was not superior to standard care alone in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes at day 28.

 

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS:

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     Giovanni Guaraldi, Marianna Meschiari, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, et al. Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol 2020;2(8):e474–84. DOI:10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30173-9.

2.     Rand Alattar, Tawheeda B. H. Ibrahim, Shahd H. Shaar, et al. Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019. J Med Virol. 2020;92(10):2042–49. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25964.

3.     Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ambreen Shoaib, Sajid Ali, Sarfaraz Alam et al. Epidemiology, risk, myths, pharmacotherapeutic management and socio economic burden due to novel COVID-19: A recent update. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(9):4435-4442. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00784.2.

4.     Sonia Mor,  Prem Saini ,  Subhash Kumar Wangnoo et al. Worldwide spread of COVID-19 Pandemic and risk factors among Co-morbid conditions especially Diabetes Mellitus in India. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(5):2530-2532. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00450.3.

5.     Abbas Kinbar Kuser, Sagban Marja Tarar , Omar Mansib Kassid et al. CNS and COVID-19: Neurological symptoms of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus in Iraq: a surveying case sequences study. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(12):6291-6294. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.01094.X.

6.     Rohit Kumar, Anshul Chawla, Gaganpreet et al. A Valuable insight to the novel deadly COVID-19: A Review. Res. J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics.2020; 12(3):111-116. DOI: 10.5958/2321-5836.2020.00021.X.

7.     Archana B. Chavhan, Pavan S. Jadhav, Satish Shelke. COVID 19: Outbreak, Structure and Current therapeutic strategies. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2021; 11(1):76-83. DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2021.00013.1.

8.     Nensi Raytthatha, Isha Shah, Jigar Vyas. An Informative Review on screening of COVID-19 (SARS-COVID-II). Res.  J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2021; 13(3):259-265. DOI: 10.52711/0975-4377.2021.00043.

9.     World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) Situation Report 51 (11 March 2020). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2020.

10.   Vandna Dewangan, Ram Sahu, Trilochan Satapathy et al. The Exploring of Current Development status and the unusual Symptoms of Coronavirus Pandemic (Covid-19). Res. J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics.2020; 12(4):172-176. DOI: 10.5958/2321-5836.2020.00031.2.

11.   Shivom, Shambaditya Goswami, Nikita Pal. A Meticulous Interpretation on a Sanguinary Disease COVID-19. Res. J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2020; 12(3):231-233. DOI: 10.5958/0975-4377.2020.00038.5.

12.   Naveen Yadam, Ganta Suhasin. Prediction of COVID-19 severity associated with Pneumonia by chest CT scan and Serological results. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021;11(3):198-202. DOI: 10.52711/2231-5713.2021.00032.

13.   Zhe Xu , Lei Shi , Yijin Wang, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med.2020;8(4):420-22. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X.

14.   Nanshan Chen, Prof Min Zhou, Xuan Dong, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.

15.   Chaolin Huang, Yeming Wang, Xingwang Li, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.

16.   Noa Biran, Andrew Ip, Jaeil Ahn, et al. Tocilizumab among patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a multicentre observational study. Lancet Rheumatol 2020;2(10):e603–13. DOI:10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30277-0.

17.   Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72,314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323(13):1239-42. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648.

18.   Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 2020;368(6490):473-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb8925.

19.   Vaninov N. In the eye of the COVID-19 cytokine storm. Nat Rev Immunol 2020;20:277. DOI: 10.1038/s41577-020-0305-6.

20.   Isha Shah, Nensi Raytthatha, Jigar Vyas et al. A Systematic Review on COVID 19 Treatment and Management. Res.  J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2021; 13(3):230-238. DOI: 10.52711/0975-4377.2021.00039.

21.   Viviane C Veiga, Joao A G G Prats, Danielle L C Farias, et al. Effect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2021;372:n84. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n84.

22.   Pan Luo, Yi Liu, Lin Qiu, Xiulan Liu, Dong Liu, Juan L. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID‐19: A single center experience. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7):814–18.DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25801.

23.   Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020;395(10229):1033-4. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.

24.   Rosas I, Brau N, Waters M, et al. Tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. medRxiv 2020.08.27.20183442. DOI:10.1101/2020.08.27.20183442.

25.   Somers EC, Eschenauer GA, Troost JP, et al. Tocilizumab for treatment of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73(2):e445-54. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa954.

26.   Tomasiewicz K, Piekarska A, Stempkowska-Rejek J, et al. Tocilizumab for patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective, multi-center study. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2021;19(1):93-100. DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1800453.

27.   Rossotti R, Travi G, Ughi N, et al, Niguarda COVID-19 Working Group. Safety and efficacy of anti-il6-receptor tocilizumab use in severe and critical patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019: A comparative analysis. J Infect 2020;81(4):e11-17.  DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.008.

28.   Moreno-Perez O, Andres M, Leon-Ramirez JM, et al. Experience with tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia after 80 days of followup: A retrospective cohort study. J Autoimmun 2020;114:102523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102523.

29.   Klopfenstein T, Zayet S, Lohse A, et al, HNF Hospital Tocilizumab multidisciplinary team. Tocilizumab therapy reduced intensive care unit admissions and/or mortality in COVID-19 patients. Med Mal Infect 2020;50(5):397-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2020.05.001.

30.   Hermine O, Mariette X, Tharaux PL, et al. Effect of Tocilizumab vs usual care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181(1):32-40. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820.

31.   Quartuccio L, Sonaglia A, Pecori D, et al. Higher levels of IL-6 early after tocilizumab distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors in COVID-19 pneumonia: A possible indication for deeper targeting of IL-6. J Med Virol 2020;92(11):2852-2856. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26149.

32.   Nishimoto N, Terao K, Mima T, Nakahara H, Takagi N, Kakehi T. Mechanisms and pathologic significances in increase in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 receptor after administration of an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Castleman disease. Blood 2008;112(10):3959-64. DOI:10.1182/blood-2008-05-155846.

33.   Rania M Sarhan, Yasmin M. Madney, Ahmed E. Abou Warda, et.al. Therapeutic efficacy, mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and mortality rate in severe COVID‐19 patients treated with tocilizumab. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75(6)e14079. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14079.

 

 

 

 

Received on 15.11.2021          Modified on 08.01.2022

Accepted on 23.02.2022        © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2023; 16(2):763-768.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00130